Nightmare (2005, dir: Dylan Bank; cast: J. Bloomrosen,
Nicole Roderick, Jolan Boockvor, Jason Scott Campbell)
I
received a free copy of this DVD when it was first released. I hated it then.
But I watched it again, several years later, to give it another chance.
Yup, still
dreadfully dull and pretentious.
In the "bonus"
features, director Dylan Bank is just so cocky, and self-important,
and full-of-himself. This lack of self-awareness reveals why he was
able to make such a boring mess while imagining that he'd
created horror greatness.
Bank tells us that he's
been a "hardcore horror fan" since childhood, etc., and that people
mistakenly assume that horror is low-brow, but that he believes that
horror fans are the most "sophisticated" of film fans.
Which is his way of
letting us know that
Nightmare is "sophisticated" horror.
In reality, his
film is a boring piece of non-horror crap. There is
no cohesion to the events onscreen, nothing coalescing into a story, just
random streams of consciousness. Is it all meant to be surreal, and
hence the title,
Nightmare?
In Bank's film, a film student awakes
beside an actress, after a night of sex. They find a video camera
pointed at their bed, containing a tape of them killing people. Yet they don't remember doing
it, and there is no blood.
That's a decent
premise for a suspense story, but Bank immediately drops it. Instead,
his film student protagonist starts to make a student film about this
recent incident. He continues shooting new scenes as he finds new
tapes of him killing people. Soon he's no longer discovering tapes of
himself killing people -- he's waking up to find himself actually killing
people. Or not.
Things keeps
happening. He kills his girlfriend. No, she's alive. He's in jail. No, he
was never in jail. He was mutilated. No, he's not mutilated. Etc. Films
within films. Nightmares within films within nightmares. What's real?
What isn't? Who cares?
Nightmare meanders from tangent to tangent. Of course, the other
film students complain of his making a film within a film, within a film,
meandering from tangent to tangent. Yes,
Nightmare is an extremely self-aware film, its characters
incessantly commenting on the film within a film, and by proxy, on
Bank's film about the film student making a film about a film student
making a film...
Hey Bank, here's a
tip -- Just because a film is self-aware does not mean that it's
sophisticated.
Nightmare is neither "sophisticated" nor a "horror" film, as Bank
smugly imagines. It's boring. There is nothing sophisticated about
an incoherent stream of random events that might, or might not, all be
a dream. (Of
course, the protagonist's fellow film students tell him, "This better
not all be a dream." -- Ha, ha, how self-aware and post-modern and
"sophisticated" to have the film student characters
commenting, by proxy, on Bank's film.)
A boring mess.
With
Nightmare, Bank proves to be a "hardcore horror fan" who knows
nothing about how to make an entertaining, much less artistic, horror
film.
"Communist Vampires" and "CommunistVampires.com" trademarks are currently unregistered, but pending registration upon need for protection against improper use. The idea of marketing these terms as a commodity is a protected idea under the Lanham Act. 15 U.S.C. s 1114(1) (1994) (defining a trademark infringement claim when the plaintiff has a registered mark); 15 U.S.C. s 1125(a) (1994) (defining an action for unfair competition in the context of trademark infringement when the plaintiff holds an unregistered mark).