MENU
Home
Books
Horror Film Aesthetics
Horror Film Festivals and Awards
Vampire
Nation
Pentagon Possessed
Cost of Freedom
Manhattan
Sharks
Halloween
Candy
Hollywood
Witches
Short Works
Pursuits
Actor
Film Festival Director
Editorial Services
Media
Appearances
Horror Film Reviews
Blogs
Horror Film Aesthetics
Communist Vampires
Horror Film Festivals and Awards
Other
Business
Satire
Nicolae Ceausescu
Commuist Vampires
Stalinist Zombies
L'Internationale Song
Links
|
NYC: Tornado Terror (2008, dir:
Tibor
Takacs; writer: T.S. Cook; cast: Nicole de Boer,
Sebastian Spence, Jerry Wasserman)
Mini-twisters
pop up around New York City, as a prelude to massive electrical
tornadoes. Sounds good, but don't be fooled by the cover. This
cheapo, annoying TV movie could have been better.
So many things wrong with this inept film...
* Flat Acting. Nicole de Boer was quite good in
Cube, so it's surprising to see her give such a flat, one
dimensional performance here. Her character loves her husband (yet
no chemistry in the actors' kisses), she struggles with the
possible death of her niece -- lot's of stuff going on here. Yet
de Boer always performs flatly.
All the actors are flat, lifeless, one-dimensional. From
the hero firefighter, to the evil NASA boss, to everyone
* I'm gonna blame the lousy script and directing.
Despite the characters' struggles, they're written as
black-and-white stereotypes.
I don't know what political axes writer T.S. Cook has to grind,
but every character is either incredibly wise, brave, and noble --
or craven and weaselly.
De Boer plays a brilliant weather scientist who works for the City
of New York. (Apparently, they have a weather department.) She's
smarter than NASA. NASA is portrayed as uniquely evil. The NASA
representative is an evil idiot. De Boer has a plan to stop the
tornadoes with dry ice, whereas NASA wants to seed them with
silver iodide.
De Boer dismisses NASA as "They're not scientists! They're a
bunch of bureaucrats!"
When the NASA guy overrules the mayor (who listens to de Boer) the
mayor accuses NASA of being "the military" and of them
wanting to "maintain the illusion of civilian control."
NASA wants to call the shots, while pretending the mayor is still
in charge.
Poor screenwriters often try to create drama by having the
characters argue. But because they argue for argument's sake, it
comes off as pointless bickering. The good and bad guys in this
film are always snapping at each other. We're supposed to root for
the "good guys," but I can't sympathize with their arrogant
testiness.
The "good guys' " self-righteous arrogance is annoying as hell. De
Boer's husband (Sebastian Spence) has some city job, and takes
over command of the city, essentially instigating a coup. But it's
okay. He and his wife are the only ones who can save the city. He
sits in his weather command center barking pointless, obvious
directives to his emergency vehicles. Things like: "They
haven't evacuated the library yet? Somebody put a fire under their
ass!"
Just why anyone would be safer outside of the
library building, with all those tornadoes in the streets, than
inside of the library -- or just where they are
supposed to be evacuated to -- is never addressed. The husband's
"life-saving" commands are vapid and pointless in the extreme.
He's dramatically barking commands for the sole purpose of being
dramatic.
His pointless commands, and his wife's seeding of the clouds
(which she orders against NASA's orders) save the city.
The junk science is weird. We're told (with arrogant
self-righteousness) that these mini-twisters are caused by global
warming. What isn't? Apparently not much. These mini-twisters also
contain lightning. Balls of electricity emanate from these
twisters. And they're cold. A group of people are frozen solid by
one passing tornado.
* Speaking of the bad directing ... in once scene, an
electrical ball floats about a hallway. A woman stares at it,
backing off. People scream at her to stand back. But then this
woman, separated from the rest of the group, just wanders slowly
around and about this electrical ball, keeping it a few feet ahead
her, not looking too frightened. Finally, the electrical
ball zaps her with lightning, so she fries.
She looked like an inept extra, wandering about the set, not
getting any clear direction from the director as to what she
should be doing or thinking.
But ... is it fair to judge a film like this by the
quality of the writing, acting, and directing? After all, you buy
this film to watch special effects.
I'd have given this film 3 stars if the special effects had been
great. But they're not. They start off okay. A few nice
mini-twisters early in the film. Two people flung into the air. A
small plane crash. A group of frozen people.
But we don't see them freeze. Likewise, we hear dog
howls, then see their empty leashes. Apparently the dogs had been
sucked up by the tornado -- which we didn't get to see.
Worse yet -- de Boer averts serious disaster. I'd thought
all those brief, small, tornado effects were a buildup to colossal
special effects of New York City being utterly destroyed over the
course of 30 to 45 minutes -- just like the DVD cover promised.
Instead -- nothing! The self-righteous heroes take
command of NYC and its emergency services, defeat NASA's idiocy,
and dissipate the tornadoes.
Booooo-riiiing!
If I'm gonna sit through so much junk science, and annoying,
one-dimensional stereotypes, I at least expect a lot more Big
Disaster Film Special Effects Destruction than in this film.
I bought this film because of de Boer (who I love in
Cube) and the tornadoes, and I was disappointed on both
counts.
This film was shot in Vancouver and it shows. If you're familiar
with New York City, as I am, you won't be fooled despite the CGI
backdrops (which look like backdrops).
I could forgive that too if the film had ended with some major,
kick-ass devastation. Too bad it ended with a whimper, not a bang.
|