Marla Mae (2018, dir:
Lisa van
Dam-Bates; cast:
Lisa van
Dam-Bates, Jason Stang, Katie Hemming, Travis Johnny Ware,
Palmer Chase)
Marla
Mae (Lisa van Dam-Bates) is a waitress at The Valley bar in Olympia.
One day, Dr. Lourdes (Jason Stang) offers to fit Marla with an IUD,
free of charge. A favor, because they were childhood friends. Marla's
boyfriend, Jake (Travis Johnny Ware), thinks it's a weird kind of
favor. Marla dismisses his concerns as jealousy.
Jake was right to
be concerned. When Marla later straddles Jason for a night of
passionate love, he begins spitting blood. Then his body
disintegrates below the waist. No more Jake between Marla's
thighs. Just the bed sheet soaked with dark blood and chunks of ...
meat? Jake -- or rather, his remaining upper half -- is dead.
Marla is freaked.
She has no idea what happened or why. Like many horror protagonists,
she is slow to make logical connections. No light bulb moment, as in
"Sex was normal until I had the IUD, so maybe the IUD is the
problem." Even after the second incident, when a rapist
disintegrates completely between her legs, Marla still thinks that she
is the problem. "There's something wrong with me, and this IUD is
making it worse."
Huh? Making
what worse? It's not like men were disintegrating just a little
bit before she had the IUD.
Marla Mae (aka
Marla) can be filed under both body horror and erotic
horror (subcategory: vagina horror, e.g.,
Teeth,
Angst, and
Grim Prairie Tales). Marla hates her new body. She doesn't want to
be a freak, or be responsible for murder. In the end, as in many
horror films, Marla confronts the mad doctor who made her what she is
...
Lisa van Dam-Bates
offers a
compelling performance as Marla Mae. Which is especially
impressive, as van Dam-Bates also wrote and directed this, her first
feature film. Even skilled actors often fall short when directing
themselves, but van Dam-Bates does a fine job on both sides of the
camera. Under her direction, the rest of the cast range from fair to
good. Scenes are well paced, the performances neither rushed nor
sluggish, the dialog sparse and naturalistic. Overall,
Marla Mae conveys the moody, contemplative tone of
It Follows.
From the start, Dr.
Lourdes comes across as creepy. I don't know how intentional that is.
His missing front tooth and unshaven face don't inspire confidence.
Two of Marla's friends call him "weird," which Marla acknowledges,
though she continues to defend him.
Marla Mae was filmed in the gritty, blue collar areas of
Olympia, Washington. I didn't know Olympia had grit. I always
thought of it as a quaint, bucolic college town. In any event, the
locations in the film are an effective backdrop for the story.
This isn't a romcom, after all.
The ending is
puzzling and ambiguous. Marla goes to have the IUD removed, and is
told there is nothing in her. What happened? Did her body absorb
the IUD? (Hence, her unwittingly insightful remark that there was
something wrong with her.) Or was it all the imaginings of a mad
woman locked away for murder? The notion that an IUD can cause
entire bodies to disintegrate is pretty insane.
I suppose there's
a theme buried in this film. Something relating to uniquely female
fears. I won't try to figure it out. Some reviews have complained
about
Marla Mae's unanswered questions, but perhaps the film is
meant to be taken symbolically rather than literally.
I'm not
bothered that I don't entirely "get"
Marla Mae, at least not yet. It was a while before I "got"
Mulholland Drive.
Marla Mae is a well crafted film, thought provoking and
entertaining, with an
engaging lead character. It's worth a look.
"Communist Vampires" and "CommunistVampires.com" trademarks are currently unregistered, but pending registration upon need for protection against improper use. The idea of marketing these terms as a commodity is a protected idea under the Lanham Act. 15 U.S.C. s 1114(1) (1994) (defining a trademark infringement claim when the plaintiff has a registered mark); 15 U.S.C. s 1125(a) (1994) (defining an action for unfair competition in the context of trademark infringement when the plaintiff holds an unregistered mark).font>