| 
			
			The Chosen One  (2009, dir: Theodore Collatos, cast: Arthur 
			Collins, Carolina Monnerat, Sam Porretta, Irena Martens, Jack 
			Silverman)      
			
			 The 
			Chosen One's story is 
			choppy and episodic, but here's a rough outline: A zombie bites a 
			young wife. As a result, she gives birth to a vampire baby. Her 
			husband gives the baby to a mad scientist who wants to study its 
			vampire blood. Trouble ensues as the mad scientist (who likes to do 
			open heart surgery on live patients) tries to raise the vampire 
			baby. 
		  
		  The Chosen One 
		  is an odd horror-art film. It boasts beautiful black & white 
		  photography, and mostly good acting. It's largely original, though 
		  similar to 
		  Nadja, another artsy, black 
		  & white, horror-art film. 
		  But whereas 
		  Nadja 
		  often bores, 
		  
		  The Chosen One 
		  suffers only a few boring patches. 
		  Nadja 
		  is more self-consciously artsy, with extended scenes that focus on 
		  form, not content. 
		  
		  The Chosen One 
		  is more engaging, holding our interest because it places greater 
		  emphasis on story, albeit a sketchy story. 
		  
		  The Chosen One 
		  has a nice period feeling, though anachronisms abound. I'm not sure to 
		  what extent that's intentional, to what extent accidental. A bit of 
		  both, I think. The 
		  film starts off looking as if it's set in the second half of the 19th 
		  century. But then some men appear in late 1700s clothing, including 
		  tricorner hats. There are also contemporary elements -- some 
		  furniture, a shirt with modern stitching, basement pipes which suggest 
		  indoor plumbing. The mad scientist says "gender" when he means "sex." 
		  (In the 1800s "gender" referred to language -- masculine and feminine 
		  words -- not to human sexuality.) And I don't think that a prostitute 
		  (who speaks with a Cockney accent, though the film is set in America) 
		  would say "incredible" when referring to great sex. That usage of the 
		  word didn't arise until the 20th century. But 
		  some anachronisms are certainly intentional. When the vampire baby is 
		  suddenly a grown woman, she dresses in a slinky pants suit, and has 
		  modern, short, slicked-back, goth hair. We hear modern music. All this 
		  adds to the film's artsy, experimental feel. 
		  There are some modern references -- a "Hitchcock Room" and a farm 
		  called "Green Acres." 
		  Altogether, the film feels like a rough collage. The story has gaps 
		  and unexplained incidents, which, along with the anachronisms, creates 
		  an impressionistic feel. An emotional portrait of horror icons and 
		  vampire tropes, rather than a linear tale. It's 
		  an interesting horror-art film, eliciting one's appreciation rather 
		  than enjoyment. It's nice to see a low-budget filmmaker experiment, 
		  giving the audience something different from the usual horror fare. Review copyright by Thomas
              M. Sipos   
 |