The Caretaker (2008, dir:
Bryce Olson; script: Jackie Olson; cast: Jennifer Tilly, Judd
Nelson, Kira Verrastro, James Immekus, Jennifer Freeman,
Andrew St. John, Diego J. Torres, Victoria Vande Vegte)
Turkey
Ranch Productions sent me a review copy of
The Caretaker, which is good and bad. It's nice to get a free
horror DVD, but it obligates me to review it, which is bad if I
didn't think much of it.
The Caretaker is a very short, very low budget affair. Only an
hour and 17 minutes long (not including credits).
These generic teenagers meet outside a school dance on Halloween
night. And they stay outside. We never go into the building and
see the dance itself. (I said this was a low budget affair.)
How low budget? Only a few locations. Most of the film was shot at
and around a farmhouse (a few rooms and a field) and inside a
limo. Then brief scenes outside the Halloween dance, and in a
girl's bedroom, and in a "gym" (it could have been the producer's
basement).
Anyway, the teens meet up outside the dance. The guys had rented a
limo, and they take the girls to an abandoned farmhouse, where
they'd planned to scare the girls. But it turns out their "scary
story" of an insane caretaker is real ... and the caretaker has
returned from the asylum (or wherever) that very night ... and, as
you might guess, the body count mounts.
The DVD box's marketing is pretty brazen, calling
The Caretaker a "classic teen scream." Based on what?
The box brags about the film's "ensemble cast of ridiculously
good-looking kids." Well, no. They're good-looking, but only in a
bland, generic sense. None of them display any charisma or
outstanding beauty.
The cast's bland good looks are matched by their bland acting, as
they mouth bland, flat writing.
The promo material that came with the DVD is accurate when it says
the film is low on gore. It also positions
The Caretaker as the next
Scream, promising "laughs and camp."
Yes, it's low on gore. But it's also low on laughs.
The Caretaker is a numbingly unoriginal film, even by slasher
standards. I suspect this may be intentional. As "camp," it
probably hopes to satirize horror film clichés.
Bad choice. This film is not funny. And for good reason. These
horror film clichés were old when
Scream attempted to satirize them in 1996 (although
Scream had
more energy than
The Caretaker). These clichés had already been targeted by
1981's
Student Bodies.
There's nothing left for
The Caretaker to satirize. Its targets are so old, I couldn't
even find any attempted jokes until nearly an hour into the
film, when the Jennifer Tilly character started talking extremely
idiotically. I then thought, okay, I'm probably supposed to
laugh at this. I can see how somebody might think this is funny,
in an insipid sitcom sense.
Tilly's character is so dummied down, she just mugs for the
camera, no real acting. Judd Nelson has a few minutes of screen
time in a cameo.
I suspect (I'm guessing here) that the "jokes" are supposed to be
that the characters (mostly teenagers) are stupid. But many horror
films are already so full of stupid teenagers that "satirizing"
stupid teenagers becomes difficult.
The Caretaker's stupid teenagers aren't really any dumber than
typical horror films' teenagers.
The Caretaker does attempt to "update" its story, such as when
the teens say, "This happened in, like, ancient times.
Like, the 1980s." (Ho! Ho! -- How's that for belly laughs?
It's about as funny and original as this film's dialog gets.)
There's nothing new in
The Caretaker, either as satire or as horror.
It's an okay film, I guess. Horror completists may wish to check
it out, provided they can get it dirt cheap in the bargin bin.
"Communist Vampires" and "CommunistVampires.com" trademarks are currently unregistered, but pending registration upon need for protection against improper use. The idea of marketing these terms as a commodity is a protected idea under the Lanham Act. 15 U.S.C. s 1114(1) (1994) (defining a trademark infringement claim when the plaintiff has a registered mark); 15 U.S.C. s 1125(a) (1994) (defining an action for unfair competition in the context of trademark infringement when the plaintiff holds an unregistered mark).font>